Can we get a general account of what telescopes everyone has

Moderators: Erik, Chopin
Post Reply   Page 1 of 2  [ 48 posts ]
Jump to page 1 2 »
Author Message
Stacy Jo
Post subject: Can we get a general account of what telescopes everyone has
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:37 am
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
I ask because I have an idea for Starstuff...the idea is to have observing lists for varying size telescopes...anyone's thoughts on this idea?

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Seantóir
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:57 am
left
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Area 14, Kildare, Ireland
 
I have a collection, none of which have had much use in the past 6 months due to foul weather:

Observing scopes
=============
152mm f/5 Newt (wide view)
102mm f/9.8 achromat (planetary)
66mm f/6 ED/APO (travel, lunar))

Solar
====
40mm f/10 Ha (PST)
127mm f/10 continuum (C5 spotting scope with Kendrik mask)

Other
====
70mm f/10 achromat (cheap "don't care about the dew" scope)

Plus assorted binos.

_________________

John

[quote]The Irish Constitution... is written in the present tense. You reason it in light of this year, not in light of the year in which it was adopted by the people. You don't need to hark back to what some people thought thirty or forty years ago. [/quote]Brian Walsh, Supreme Court Justice 1961-90

O....o?oo


Top
Profile Quote
Erik
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:38 pm
Site Admin
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 12645
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: Off Grid in Paradise... Mag 7 skies
 
That's a great idea, Stacy! Here's my current list:

16" f/4.5 truss/strut dob
Stellarvue 80ED f/7 Nighthawk NG
Homemade 80mm f/5 refractor
Konus 20x80 binos
Orion 10x50 Worldview binos
Nikon 16-48x 65mm spotting scope
Carson 7x32 monocular

_________________

-Erik Wilcox
Homebuilt 16" Truss Dob
8" Antares f/5 Newt
SV 80mm ED Nighthawk NG on M1 ALT/AZ
Nikon Prostaff 65mm spotter on Trekpod
Konusvue 20x80 binos/Peterson PipeMount


"Newt Gingrich is what stupid people think smart people sound like."
-The Great Paul Krugman

Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. -Anonymous


Top
Profile Quote
snorkler
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:55 pm
quasar
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:16 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
 
I agree.

My list:
18" f/4.2 Nightsky truss Dobsonian
10" f/4.7 Orion Intelliscope Dobsonian
10" f/4 Meade Schmidt-Newtonian on Losmandy G-11 GEM
8" f/10 Meade Schmidt-Cassegrain on LXD-75 GEM
6" f/5 Meade Schmidt-Newtonian on LXD-55 GEM
90 mm. f/13.8 Meade Maksutov-Cassegrain on DSX mount
80 mm. f/7.5 Orion 80ED refractor on AZ-3 mount
80 mm. f/6 Pentax PF-80ED spotting scope on Bogen 3210 tripod
various binoculars from 8X42 to 25X100

_________________

Ah, but I was so much older then.
I'm younger than that now
Bob Dylan

[ img ]
49.6 mpg avg over 38,000 miles. 177% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 9.8 mi
Best tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:10 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Thanks peeps...so far I am seeing a range of 66mm to 457mm in objective size...that's a wide range....but given the range, up to 16 magnitude for various star charts.

Here's my idea more fleshed out...given range, say 66mm to 157mm, there are star charts up to 6.5 magnitude, 158 to 200mm, another star chart going up to 12 magnitude...and anything that fits in the larger sizes, up to 16 magnitude.

These magnitude ranges are based on the objective size only, because EP's and the type of objective will either enhance or dehance the magnitude of what a telescope can theoritically see...just trying to keep it simple. And of course, the LM of one's particular observing area comes into play. But if there were a base line of LM in an urban area for star charts, then it may be a good resource for what one might see within the least ideal observing situation.

So there it is...my idea...I'm sure someone has thought of this for sure, however, I'm still researching for this type of resource so that it is centralized for everyone..

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
snorkler
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:19 pm
quasar
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 5125
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:16 pm
Location: Bay Area, California
 
I like the Night Sky Observers Guide by Kepple and Sanner, because it does tell you what to expect when you're observing different objects through different size scopes. M11 or M13 don't look like much through an 80 or 90 mm. scope, but they sure are impressive in a 10" or larger scope.

_________________

Ah, but I was so much older then.
I'm younger than that now
Bob Dylan

[ img ]
49.6 mpg avg over 38,000 miles. 177% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 9.8 mi
Best tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:22 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
snorkler wrote:
I like the Night Sky Observers Guide by Kepple and Sanner, because it does tell you what to expect when you're observing different objects through different size scopes. M11 or M13 don't look like much through an 80 or 90 mm. scope, but they sure are impressive in a 10" or larger scope.


I have that and it is well written and a grea source...I'm thinking of something more streamlined...kind of like a quick print and go type of deal...might have to pull one together, which would be great fun!

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Gary
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:03 am
molecule
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 8:17 am
Location: USA Louisiana
 
Great idea Stacy!

My list includes:

60-mm f/5 Achro
4" f/9.8 Achro
6" f/8 Newt
8" SCT
10" f/5.6 Newt
12.5" f/7.1 Newt
Various binos

There's some other scopes, but the above is what I use on a fairly regular basis.


Top
Profile Quote
GeneralRageSC
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:43 am
atom
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: NorCal
 
Stacy Jo wrote:
snorkler wrote:
I like the Night Sky Observers Guide by Kepple and Sanner, because it does tell you what to expect when you're observing different objects through different size scopes. M11 or M13 don't look like much through an 80 or 90 mm. scope, but they sure are impressive in a 10" or larger scope.


I have that and it is well written and a grea source...I'm thinking of something more streamlined...kind of like a quick print and go type of deal...might have to pull one together, which would be great fun!



Stacy,

Yeap, the NSOG is a great resource and will keep someone busyfor years.

Regards a more streamlined "atlas". I just make my own. They follow the same format as my three published books.

For myself, I've made the following
Shakhbazian Groups - available the the GSSP website
Local Group - available the the GSSP website
Galaxy Trios - available the the GSSP website
Small Galaxy Groups - available the the GSSP website
The above four are on my website, but I didn't make a link for it yet. I will when I release the next two below.

Globular Clusters (all above -50 dec)
Planetary Nebulae (300+)


Then this one
Abell Galaxy Clusters (65+ AGC's)

So I have enought to keep me going for a while.



Oh, my scope list is
22" f/4 homebuilt
6" f/6.5 Antares achromat on SVP mount
5" f/7.7 Takahashi TOA-130S on AP1200 mount
30" f/4.3 Starmaster - to be sold.
Couple other scopes not worth listing.

Both the 22" and 30" will be replaced by an ultralight 28" f/3.5, which will be only 2" longer than my 22"...but smaller in storage size. The 28" is halfway done. I'll have the mirror in Feb.

_________________

Clear Skies,
Alvin #26
22" f/4.1 reflector, 30" f/4.3 StarMaster and Antares 6" f/6.5 on Orion SVP, 28" f/3.275 (under construction)
[url=http://www.faintfuzzies.com]FaintFuzzies[/url] | [url=http://www.observers.org]TAC[/url] | [url=http://www.tac-sac.org]TAC-Sac[/url]


Top
Profile Quote
Chopin
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:41 pm
Velocepedist
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6706
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:28 pm
Location: In search of the ultimate switchbacks and single tracks
 
Stacy, I like the idea. A list that incorporates expected results/objects for both given aperture and local NELM would be very useful. Something like this could serve well for sidewalk astronomy, too, where overhead darkness isn't always ideal, and where your locations change.

If you were to build lists based on field of view, I'd recommend giving a little to the bino guys. There are tons of lists for galaxy lovers, but many fewer for widefield scanners.


It's probably a bit useless now, but my arsenal includes:

8x40 bino
15x85 bino
4.5" newt
10" newt (in pieces)
12" newt

_________________

Jason® (Admin...and spoke-folk)
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
Veritable Imagery
Single ride personal records: Distance-76.7miles, Max Speed-50.4mph, Max sustained speed (20miles) 19.5mph
“Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.” ― Albert Einstein


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:43 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Chopin wrote:
Stacy, I like the idea. A list that incorporates expected results/objects for both given aperture and local NELM would be very useful. Something like this could serve well for sidewalk astronomy, too, where overhead darkness isn't always ideal, and where your locations change.

If you were to build lists based on field of view, I'd recommend giving a little to the bino guys. There are tons of lists for galaxy lovers, but many fewer for widefield scanners.


It's probably a bit useless now, but my arsenal includes:

8x40 bino
15x85 bino
4.5" newt
10" newt (in pieces)
12" newt


I think your idea of the wideview list is fabulous! And no, your list isn't useless at all. just trying to get a base line here...so the more telescopes that are listed, the better.

Stacy

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Square_peg
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:27 pm
The Blacksmith
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:51 am
Location: Maple Valley, WA
 
Here's my list.

DSH-8 (GSO Dob)
15x70 Oberwerks
SVP 100 f/6 achro
WO 66 Petzval
Sears Discoverer EQ 60/900
8x42 Regals

_________________

Tom (Pegster)

subvert the dominant paradigm


Top
Profile Quote
Erik
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:08 pm
Site Admin
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 12645
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: Off Grid in Paradise... Mag 7 skies
 
Do you get a lot of use out of that WO 66mm, Tom? I've thought that owning one of those would be pretty cool, but wondered about the capabilities of such a small aperture. However, after using the 65mm Nikon spotter I have, I've found it to be a lot of fun.

I still don't know how WO sells such a nice scope at such a low price...

_________________

-Erik Wilcox
Homebuilt 16" Truss Dob
8" Antares f/5 Newt
SV 80mm ED Nighthawk NG on M1 ALT/AZ
Nikon Prostaff 65mm spotter on Trekpod
Konusvue 20x80 binos/Peterson PipeMount


"Newt Gingrich is what stupid people think smart people sound like."
-The Great Paul Krugman

Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. -Anonymous


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 1:39 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Looks like we have a pretty good range of aperature thus far.

The project is starting to jell on paper for me and will start posting roughd drafts for everyone to check out and comment on.

Last night was nice and clear in Oakland...got some time in with Jupiter...wanted to stay out later, but had a client to meet this morning...I'm thinking tonight will be a longer session.

Stacy

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Erik
Post subject:
Posted: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:49 pm
Site Admin
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 12645
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: Off Grid in Paradise... Mag 7 skies
 
Cool- looking forward to seeing what you come up with, Stacy! :cool:

Hope you get some good observing in tonight too! :)

_________________

-Erik Wilcox
Homebuilt 16" Truss Dob
8" Antares f/5 Newt
SV 80mm ED Nighthawk NG on M1 ALT/AZ
Nikon Prostaff 65mm spotter on Trekpod
Konusvue 20x80 binos/Peterson PipeMount


"Newt Gingrich is what stupid people think smart people sound like."
-The Great Paul Krugman

Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. -Anonymous


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:28 am
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Erik wrote:
Cool- looking forward to seeing what you come up with, Stacy! :cool:

Hope you get some good observing in tonight too! :)


Thanks Erik...I'm thinking that it may be a good winter project...but hopefully won't take that long!

The heat busted my ass yesterday...manage to get in some nekked eye observing in when we went up on the roof to cool down.

It's much cooler today, but I am wondering if that will preclude a clear sky tonight??? Guess I should get on over to the weather sites.

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Square_peg
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:00 pm
The Blacksmith
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:51 am
Location: Maple Valley, WA
 
Erik wrote:
Do you get a lot of use out of that WO 66mm, Tom? I've thought that owning one of those would be pretty cool, but wondered about the capabilities of such a small aperture.


I've gotten a surprising amount of use from it. I keep it on a light weight EQ mount that came with my Sears Discoverer. A Vixen 8-24 zoom resides in the focuser. It makes a nice grab-n-go scope for moon and planets. I'll often bring out a Celestron Ultima barlow with it to turn in the eyepiece into a~ 4-12 zoom. Very handly focal lengths for a zoom! :cool:

Besides moon and planets and I've used it for tracking the night-to-night motion of bright comets. It's excellent for this.

Of course it's not a true Petzval as the 2 rear elements move with the focuser. And the color isn't quite as good as the ED scopes (from what I've heard) but it's good enough that I don't bother using a minus-V filter with it ( I have one for my 100mm achro that's I've tried with it).

In short, it's my "no you've got no excuse not to get out and view" scope. :lol:

_________________

Tom (Pegster)

subvert the dominant paradigm


Top
Profile Quote
Erik
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:04 pm
Site Admin
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 12645
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: Off Grid in Paradise... Mag 7 skies
 
Sounds like the perfect grab and go setup with the zoom ep in the focuser. That's what I like about the spotter, though I'd like to get more than 48x out of it. Unfortunately, Nikon doesn't make a high power ep or barlow. I'll have to try and see if standard ep's fit in it.

Those 66's are so tiny. I was thinking that mounting one on the iOptron Cube would also make a great grab and go setup- complete with go-to. Talk about no excuse to go out and observe! :grin:

_________________

-Erik Wilcox
Homebuilt 16" Truss Dob
8" Antares f/5 Newt
SV 80mm ED Nighthawk NG on M1 ALT/AZ
Nikon Prostaff 65mm spotter on Trekpod
Konusvue 20x80 binos/Peterson PipeMount


"Newt Gingrich is what stupid people think smart people sound like."
-The Great Paul Krugman

Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. -Anonymous


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 5:00 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Trying not to re-invent the wheel...

So, I had this great idea (and it still may be great) about compiling a list of varying magnitude objects for binos, small telescopes and medium telescopes.

As I was going through one of my boxes, I came across Touring the Universe through Binoculars By Philip Harrington...I forgot I had it! As I was getting re-familiarized with it, it dawned on me that this is a great resource for binos and small telescopes, not to mention Sky&Telescope's Pocket Sky Atlas.

And one more if you can find it...The Observer's Sky Atlas by E. Karkoschka.

Comments, thoughts?

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Chopin
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:59 am
Velocepedist
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6706
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:28 pm
Location: In search of the ultimate switchbacks and single tracks
 
I've heard great thing about Harrington's book. He a real bino nut. It's one of the books on my short list.

_________________

Jason® (Admin...and spoke-folk)
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
Veritable Imagery
Single ride personal records: Distance-76.7miles, Max Speed-50.4mph, Max sustained speed (20miles) 19.5mph
“Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.” ― Albert Einstein


Top
Profile Quote
Chopin
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:06 am
Velocepedist
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 6706
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:28 pm
Location: In search of the ultimate switchbacks and single tracks
 
Stace, I wouldn't worry about creating a redundant product. I think your project will ultimately do two things.

1) You will become extra familiar with parts of the sky you knew very little about.

2) Those of us who use your new atlas/charts will find a new way of hunting and finding. That is often the biggest part of the fun. Besides, you may throw some objects on there that even veterans have never taken the time to visit.


If you have time to do so, maybe you could put together a sample of what you're thinking and see how some of the peeps here like it. Just an idea. You never know 'til you try, and there is never waste in trying.

_________________

Jason® (Admin...and spoke-folk)
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
Veritable Imagery
Single ride personal records: Distance-76.7miles, Max Speed-50.4mph, Max sustained speed (20miles) 19.5mph
“Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance, you must keep moving.” ― Albert Einstein


Top
Profile Quote
Stacy Jo
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:08 pm
star
Offline
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:52 am
Location: Oakland, CA
 
Chopin wrote:
Stace, I wouldn't worry about creating a redundant product. I think your project will ultimately do two things.

1) You will become extra familiar with parts of the sky you knew very little about.

2) Those of us who use your new atlas/charts will find a new way of hunting and finding. That is often the biggest part of the fun. Besides, you may throw some objects on there that even veterans have never taken the time to visit.


If you have time to do so, maybe you could put together a sample of what you're thinking and see how some of the peeps here like it. Just an idea. You never know 'til you try, and there is never waste in trying.


Thanks for the support Chopin...your idea of a "sample" list is a good one and we all can take it from there. It will be fun.

_________________

Clear skies, Stacy

StellerVue 80mm Nighthawk
Orion Starblast 6" Newtonian
Old Jason 3" reflector
Orion 8x50 binoculars (which need some re-alignment)
Two wonderful and beautiful hazel green eyes


Top
Profile Quote
Square_peg
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:30 pm
The Blacksmith
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:51 am
Location: Maple Valley, WA
 
Erik wrote:
Those 66's are so tiny. I was thinking that mounting one on the iOptron Cube would also make a great grab and go setup- complete with go-to. Talk about no excuse to go out and observe! :grin:


I know that choices are a very personal thing but for me there is no current go-to setup that I would consider grab-n-go. When they come up with something that I can set out on the lawn and without any alignment routine I can tell it to go to Comet McNaught and it does so accurately then I'll accept it as a grab-n-go setup.

YMMV.

_________________

Tom (Pegster)

subvert the dominant paradigm


Top
Profile Quote
Erik
Post subject:
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:08 pm
Site Admin
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 12645
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:58 pm
Location: Off Grid in Paradise... Mag 7 skies
 
Good point, Tom. That's why I enjoy a simple ALT/AZ mount. Go-to is often pointless with a small scope anyway, though tracking would be nice for high power viewing.

_________________

-Erik Wilcox
Homebuilt 16" Truss Dob
8" Antares f/5 Newt
SV 80mm ED Nighthawk NG on M1 ALT/AZ
Nikon Prostaff 65mm spotter on Trekpod
Konusvue 20x80 binos/Peterson PipeMount


"Newt Gingrich is what stupid people think smart people sound like."
-The Great Paul Krugman

Evolution is both fact and theory. Creationism is neither. -Anonymous


Top
Profile Quote
Seantóir
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:11 am
left
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Area 14, Kildare, Ireland
 
Agreed. I started with an AltAz. I've had a NexStar 4 and I have an LXD75 and two manual GEMs, and I still prefer an AltAz.

_________________

John

[quote]The Irish Constitution... is written in the present tense. You reason it in light of this year, not in light of the year in which it was adopted by the people. You don't need to hark back to what some people thought thirty or forty years ago. [/quote]Brian Walsh, Supreme Court Justice 1961-90

O....o?oo


Top
Profile Quote
o1d_dude
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:43 am
atom
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:05 am
Location: The Big Tomato
 
May as well jump in here...

I have a 4" f/10 refractor (Celestron C4-R) and a 6" f/5 reflector optimized for astro photography (oversized secondary, etc) that I assembled from commercial parts about 30 years ago (Coulter primary and secondary, Parks fiberglass tube, Kenneth Novak spider, etc.).

A possible new addition might be one of the Stellarvue SV80/9D Certified Pre-Owned but I've not yet spoken to Vic.

No one asked but I also have a pair of Nikon 10x25 binocs as well as a 30 year old pair of 7x50s. I've been thinking about upgrading to a pair of Garrett Optical 20x80s.

Hope this helps.

Kit

...dang! Still no sig. I gotta get on that.


Top
Profile Quote
Kawx4d
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:14 am
Steely-Eyed Missile Man
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 5075
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:18 pm
Location: According to Heisenberg, I'm uncertain...
 
My current ones are listed in my sig line.

Past scopes were as follows:

14.5" f/4.3 Starmaster (6 years)
Meade 8" LX-10 SCT (3 years)
80mm f/6 WO Megrez (3 years)

I list the past ones as well because I had a lot of observation time with those and should be able chime in on observations I did with them.

_________________

Kerry

[ img ]


Oh, yeah. The Stifmeister's coming back to Grand Harbor. Deck the halls. Bye-bye, Great Falls. Wipe my a$$ and lick my ba!!s It's Stifler time, baby. Whoo-hoo-hoo. Whoo-hoo-hoo. ~Steve Stifler-American Pie 2 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
Profile Quote
Kawx4d
Post subject:
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 8:17 am
Steely-Eyed Missile Man
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 5075
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:18 pm
Location: According to Heisenberg, I'm uncertain...
 
Oh yeah, hoping to replace the old 14.5 SM with a Webster in the 18" - 24" range. Planned on doing it by now, but with the economy, and not really having time to get to dark sites like I used to I held off................ :-({|=

_________________

Kerry

[ img ]


Oh, yeah. The Stifmeister's coming back to Grand Harbor. Deck the halls. Bye-bye, Great Falls. Wipe my a$$ and lick my ba!!s It's Stifler time, baby. Whoo-hoo-hoo. Whoo-hoo-hoo. ~Steve Stifler-American Pie 2 :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
Profile Quote
Square_peg
Post subject:
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:30 pm
The Blacksmith
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 3055
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 11:51 am
Location: Maple Valley, WA
 
Stacy Jo wrote:
Trying not to re-invent the wheel...

So, I had this great idea (and it still may be great) about compiling a list of varying magnitude objects for binos, small telescopes and medium telescopes.



I used to have a link to club website in Ohio (I think) that had a nice list of brighter objects for small scopes and urban observers. Danged if I can remember what it was called..... :?:

_________________

Tom (Pegster)

subvert the dominant paradigm


Top
Profile Quote
o1d_dude
Post subject:
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 5:53 pm
atom
User avatar
Offline
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2008 12:05 am
Location: The Big Tomato
 
I need to update my previously published scope inventory.

This morning I paid a visit to Vic Maris at Stellarvue and bought one of his "Certified Previously Owned" SV80/9D tubes. The serial number of mine is "CPO0015" if anyone is keeping track.

He also had one of the original Nighthawks in his CPO inventory as well. I really liked the black finish and the heft of the Nighthawk but given my poor backyard skies, the SV80/9D made more sense.

The Stellarvue showroom is nothing short of amazing. As a result of today's visit, I have revised my scope progression plan to reflect the following goals: 1. SV80/9d (achieved), 2. Nighthawk NextGen, 3. SV102ED Deluxe, 4. SV115T.

I can dream, right?

_________________

OD

o1der_than_dirt


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 2  [ 48 posts ]
Return to “Telescopes and Binoculars” | Jump to page 1 2 »
Jump to:
cron